Latest:
Showing posts with label Review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Review. Show all posts

Friday, 7 April 2017

ASUS R510J Review: An Entry-Level Gaming Laptop Worth Buying?

When it comes to gaming laptops in India, the options are not much varied. Also, the existing range of gaming laptops is overpriced, which goes beyond the budget of an average Indian consumer. ASUS, which has been consistently coming up with its new range of laptops bundled with latest features has introduced ASUS R510J - An entry level Budget Gaming Laptop. We got to test the review unit for a period of 2 weeks and here I share my personal, and honest review about this gaming notebook.

Wednesday, 5 April 2017

My Didi Review: Should you try their services?

One of the most tedious and time-consuming tasks that we come across in our daily lives is cleaning our homes. Believe me, the maid not turning up for work is one of the worst nightmares for many. It is often very difficult to find good maids with professional skills and even if you are lucky enough, their untimely leaves turn into a chaotic situation. At times, you are not just satisfied with the quality of work and you want to get deep-cleaned by professionals for festivals or special occasions when you expect a lot of visitors. Almost all of us come across similar situations and to solve this pain-points, a startup My Didi has started professional services on the similar lines.

Monday, 5 December 2016

Dear Zindagi, A Message To Life.

Film: Dear Zindagi.
Cast: Alia Bhatt (Kaira), Shah Rukh Khan (Jug), Kunal Kapoor, Angad Bedi, Ali Zafar.
Director and Story: Gauri Shinde
Producer: Karan Johar, Gauri Khan and Gauri Shinde.

Lately, the content of the films is experimental. And Gauri Shinde's film Dear Zindagi is one of it. With the story of a working girl figuring out her life, Dear Zindagi is not a typical Bollywood film. Gauri Shinde creates magic when it comes to building character and leading them into a relatable story. And the same magic was felt with Kaira’s character to which any woman in her 20s and 30s will relate to. 

Monday, 14 November 2016

Rock On 2 Review: Does it rock again?

It's been 8 years since the movie Rock On released in 2008, but it still remains so fresh in our memories due to a distinct genre of music, which is still a rare epicentre for movies in India. So, as an audience, the expectation from Rock On 2 becomes even higher.

Monday, 7 November 2016

Drawbacks of Reliance Jio

One of the most trending topic to watch-out this year is “The launch of Jio sim”. With each day passing-by, their is a rapid increase in its customers. Although very few customers have found this initiative of Reliance interesting and helpful in connecting common people with the digital world. I have been a Jio user for almost two months now and fund few interesting drawbacks about it.

Following are the few drawbacks (disadvantages) that I observed:

Thursday, 25 August 2016

Movie Review: On The Road | A film with Scenic route & Ecstatic beats

To start with the uplifting news: America the Beautiful has seldom looked more ripe for exploration than it does in "On the Road," an honorable endeavor by the Brazilian director Walter Salles ("The Motorcycle Diaries," "Central Station") to capture literary lightning in a vessel. With roomy skies extending ceaselessly over open, uncongested roads bordered by amber waves of grain, and purple mountains alluring out there, the movie resurrects a lasting outskirts dream and invites you to barrel into the unknown with its Beat Generation legends.

That elusive lightning is the electricity in the hopped-up prose of "On the Road," Jack Kerouac's 1957 novel, which 10 years after its publication inspired countless stoned hippie odysseys to Haight-Ashbury and beyond. But, can prose that snaps and sizzles be interpreted into a zapping movie?

The container for all that energy is José Rivera's scrupulously out-and-out screen adaptation, which tries with only fitful success to convey the bravado, passion and verve of Kerouac's besotted streams of consciousness. When you peer through the verbal firecrackers, what lies beyond?

The beauty and precision of Eric Gautier's cinematography give everything, from the great outdoors to the cramped dingy bars of late- 1940s New York to a Mexican brothel, a surreal visual intensity that makes it look both archetypal and ‘fresh out of the box’ new.

It is useful to remember that the restless seeking chronicled in the novel started two years after World War II, in 1947, when the United States was a much poorer, more innocent country. The movie does a terrific job of evoking an explosive, optimistic sense of possibility as the country, in the flush of triumph, flexed its aggregate muscle and set about reinventing itself.
The film is one of the few movies about an author to resist (however not always) the cliché picture of the touchy writer at his typewriter conjuring the muse as he looks profoundly into space. Sal Paradise (Sam Riley), Kerouac's alter ego, steadily takes notes during his adventures, and his astutely picked voice-over readings of short passages from the novel fuse with the jagged visual rhythms.

"On the Road" has a super hot vintage jazz soundtrack in which the music of Charlie Parker and Slim Gaillard splendidly distils the hyperkinetic frenzy of hot-wired characters on a literary bender jumping out of their skin from Benzedrine, coffee, alcohol, and marijuana.

Also, now for the not all that great news: If there is little to actively dislike about "On the Road," there is a great deal to be disappointed in. It's debatable whether anybody could play its sexy, near-mythic pied piper, Dean Moriarty (Garrett Hedlund), aka Neal Cassady, the charismatic, free-spirited hipster about whom every devoted reader of "On the Road" has a personal fantasy.

Mr. Hedlund, who was in the film version of "Friday Night Lights" and in "Troy," has the all-American great looks and easygoing charm for the role but radiates none of the feral danger associated with a desperate thrill seeker compelled to push limits. And, a subplot in which, Dean searches for his father, is so perfunctorily dropped into the film, it is emotionally weightless.

The role would have been ideal for the young Marlon Brando, who Kerouac hoped might play Dean in a movie opposite himself as Sal. Other conceivable candidates include the youthful Robert De Niro, Ed Harris and perhaps, quite possibly, Ryan Gosling. But, Mr. Hedlund is simply too wholesome a screen presence to play a maniacal rebel.

Mr. Riley, who portrayed Joy Division's Ian Curtis in "Control," is even all the more gravely miscast as Sal. In addition to lacking Kerouac's dark movie-star looks, he radiates little of the inner fire that crackled through Kerouac's written work.

"On the Road" is truly a romantic paean to a charismatic madman told by his worshipful acolyte and chronicler as they befuddle the continent over several years. In the book, character development and storytelling are auxiliary to impacts of supercharged written work that is what might as well be called jazz improvisation. But since so little of that language is in the film, Sal develops as an earnest, aloof, almost drippy disciple more worried about gathering material for a novel than with living high in the moment.

The sex and drugs Kerouac described with a touch of thrilled revelation in the novel go over in the film as the same old sex and drugs that lost their mystery in the mass hippie freak-out of the 1960s. I would much preferably envision it then see all the banal mechanics. The film doesn't try to summon the conflict between the lives of these bohemian wild men and the square America of the 1940s and '50s.

On a visit to New Orleans, Old Bull Lee, aka William S. Burroughs (Viggo Mortensen, miscast), puts in an appearance. Carlo Marx, aka Allen Ginsberg (Tom Sturridge), is a moist, moony poet captivated by Dean. In the cameo roles of the ill-treated women in Dean's life, Kristen Stewart smolders with sullen, defiant sensuality as she tries to keep up with the boys, and Kirsten Dunst reacts to Dean's betrayals with outraged indignation. Since these female impediments to Dean's selfish pleasure seeking are far more real on the screen than in the book, his romantic mystique is lethally discolored in the move. It all seems  — dare I say it? — Of little consequence.

On The Road is rated R (Under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian). It has sexual situations, strong language, and nudity.



Written by Sukanya Roy
Artist, Critic, Writer, Photographer, Movie buff, Graphic Designer, Literature and Geography enthusiast, Soccer fan, and Imaginative.

Thursday, 4 August 2016

Why is 'Madaari' a must watch movie of the year?

To Indians, Madaari is a frequent term they often come across. A juggler, as it is known in English, acts as the protagonist in the latest movie directed by Nishikant Kamat. Mourning over your loss will get you nowhere. Fighting for answers is the only way to get the closure you’re looking for. Since influential people will not be very accommodating, you have to choose the other, more dangerous way to seek your answers. This is exactly what, Nirmal Kumar (Irrfan Khan), a common man, do in the movie. After losing his son in a tragic man-made disaster, the single father is torn apart and his life shatters. With a broken heart, grieving over Apu’s, his son, death, he plans and kidnaps the son of a powerful minister with the aim of getting answers out of the influential people. He wants to know the culprit and nothing else.

The theme of the movie might have been a part of various other flicks but the emotional quotient and the phenomenal acting of Irrfan Khan and other actors give the movie a totally different light. It appeals to the audience, especially middle-class people. Needless to say, Irrfan Khan steals the show with his mind-blowing acting. Be it an emotional scene, especially the one in the hospital, or other incidents where he has to buckle up and face the cops or other authoritative people, he supersedes all. His dialogue delivery makes the lines even more appealing and one can’t help but admire his performance. Irrfan Khan has surely become an actor who will never disappoint. His recent movies have put him on a higher pedestal and he has earned every bit of it. Be it Piku, Jurassic Park or The Lunch Box, Irrfan has proved over and over that he can fit in any role and bring it to life.

Jimmy Shergill, Uday Tikekar, and Tushar Dalvi are equally impactful and gracefully perform their part. As a cop, Jimmy has done justice to the role and he never seems out of the place.

The tagline of the movie is equally catchy. “Sshhh...Desh So Raha Hai” hits where it hurts the most. The negligence of people is certainly an issue dealt with in the movie and that too in the right way. With zero exaggeration, the movie appeals to the viewers in ways more than one.

On many occasions, audience subconsciously finds itself comparing their situation with that of Nirmal’s. It is a movie full of emotions which are put in the right quantity. It makes it apt for the family audience. The lovely relationship between a father and son is rightly portrayed. This is a relationship which remains unaffected and stands strong. Be it a powerless middle-class family or the powerful one, both have certain relationships they care about. The same is shown in the movie and it underlines the importance of family, a thing Indian audience can definitely relate to. How a father is left with guilt, sorrow and revenge after the tragic death of his son touch the hearts of the viewers.

Nishikant Kamat’s vision and the idea is crystal clear. He has surely done a commendable job as the director. The flashback technique employed by him only makes the story more impactful. The climax of the movie is worth mentioning as well. The message conveyed is accurate and spot on. It has surely earned the position of one of the must watch movies of the year. You will surely walk out of the theatre with teary eyes and a heart full of emotions.

#Madaari is a must watch!



Written by Priyanka Chauhan
A bibliophile and an aspiring writer who lives with a dream to travel the world.

Wednesday, 20 July 2016

The delights of watching "21 Jump Street"

Is pop culture like a stream, flowing relentlessly forward so that nobody ever steps in the same waters twice? Then again is it like a coral reef – or, less naturally, a landfill – formed out of the continuous accretion of new matter? If two wildly dissimilar objects have the same name, does it make any sense to compare them? Assuming this is the case, how? If it is not too much trouble pardon the philosophical tenor of these questions: I’ve recently seen “21 Jump Street” and it has left me in a ruminative mood.

Not that the movie, directed by Phil Lord and Christopher Miller and based on account the semi-beloved, faintly recalled Fox cop show that made Johnny Depp a star in the late 80s, aims to be thought-provoking. It wants to be fun and, to a perhaps surprising extent, it is. Largely forsaking the sweet multiculturalism of the original for white-dude bromance, and totally abandoning earnest teenagers-in-crisis melodrama in favour of crude, aggressive comedy, this “21 Jump Street” is an example of how formula-driven entertainment can succeed. It is loaded with the usual boy-comedy stuff: homophobic humor so blatant that it must be making fun of homophobia (right?); easy, knowing send-ups of movie and television clichés; appearances by actors from your favorite sitcoms (assuming you like “The Office”, “Parks and Recreation” and “New Girl”); exploding cars: a joke about “Glee”. And however no conceptual ground is broken that wasn’t already trampled and scorched in the Harold and Kumar movie (to refer to just the three most sophisticated cases), the entire chaos is silly, spirited and, yes, savvy enough to work.

Two high school classmates – an alpha dog named Jenko (Channing Tatum) and a loser-nerd named Schmidt (Jonah Hill) –cross paths again at the police academy, where their friendship bridges the gulf of coolness. Their spectacular incompetence and raw inexperience land them in an undercover operation run out of an abandoned church by an angry captain played by Ice Cube, also heard on the soundtrack expressing a rather critical view of law enforcement in a vintage song by his former group N.W.A.

The juxtaposition of the middle-aged Ice Cube as a foul-mouthed cop with the young Ice Cube as a foul-mouthed cop hater typifies the film’s playful, grabbing idea of itself. There are some obligatory ‘80s and early ‘90s references, and cameos from some of the old “21 Jump Street” cast members, but ageing Generation X nostalgists - not that I have anybody particular in mind– may be disappointed, which is a good thing.

Jenko and Schmidt suffer their own micro-generational displacement, which is much funnier than big shoulder pads, shaggy mullets or acid-washed denim. Sent back to high school, where they masquerade as students, these 20 somethings are shocked to discover how much has changed since 2005. Everybody texts, and the old social hierarchies seem to have broken down. Kids these days are so tolerant and sensitive and environmentally conscious, Jenko notes, with some dismay. “I blame “Glee”,” he says.

There is, obviously, a genetic connection between that show and this movie. On TV “21 Jump Street” was an hour-long youth-targeted Fox prime-time offering that mixed whimsy, emotion and public-service-announcement sobriety as it confronted social ills like bullying, bigotry and drug abuse. The movie takes aggressive satirical aim at exactly this kind of piety without risking true offensiveness. Among the bad guys, for instance, is a clique of diverse, articulate, college-bound, ecology-minded teenagers, led by Eric (Dave Franco), whose very existence destroys the categories Schmidt and Jenko rely on and who are also dealing dangerous drugs.

Eventually action-movie police work overwhelms high-school high jinks, which is too bad, since Mr. Lord and Mr. Miller operator (who previously directed the chaotic animated film “Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs”) show no specific distinction in setting up chases and shootouts. The real energy in the film comes from Mr. Hill and Mr. Tatum, who at the same time fulfill and reverse their buddy-movie stereotypes.

Thanks to the crazy upside-down world of 2012, and also a clerical mix-up, Schmidt is cast as the big shot – with an only slightly inappropriate romantic possibility played by Brie Larson – while the beefy, bull-necked Jenko is exiled to the world of wonks and dweebs. This may not be a terribly freshidea, but the two lead actors are agile and nimble and unembarrassable enough to render the identity confusion amusing and even, sometimes, touching. 

“21 Jump Street” makes a virtue of its own lack of novelty, reveling in its dumb gags and retrograde attitudes – in 2012 women can actually be funny! - With such unaffected exuberance that you may find yourself not only tickled, but also charmed.

“21 Jump Street” is rated R (Under 17 requires accompanying parents or adult guardian). Far too much raw language for network prime time, however sex, gore and nudity are well within broadcast bounds.


Written by Sukanya Roy
Artist, Critic, Writer, Photographer, Movie buff, Graphic Designer, Literature and Geography enthusiast, Soccer fan, and Imaginative.

Thursday, 14 July 2016

How User reviews at AspectWise enable better buying decisions

Online Reviews is the latest word-of-mouth when it comes to buying gadgets, ranging from Mobile to Laptops and various other accessories. It is certainly very crucial to see if the the product you are going to buy would suffice your need. There are already a lot of famous publishers like Digit, BGR and Gadgets 360 (NDTV) where we can see the specifications and reviews of the latest gadgets. But what if we could get a website wherein we get only user reviews, which means personal experience of normal users who have already bought that product. Well, the biggest advantage that those reviews would not be biased and it certainly adds more credibility where users themselves have a say after using the gadget. Aspectwise enables you to make smarter buying decisions when it comes to gadgets using user opinions and ratings.

A gadget being good or bad is a relative term, one person might be looking for a phone with good camera while someone else wants a phone with a good battery life. One of the best features of Aspectwise is that it enables you to filter your search criteria for gadgets using your buying preference. For example in the mobile sections, along with the price range, it includes the options of Design fan, Camera lover, Heavy users etc. In case you want to search phones having a good camera, your result would be Best Camera Phones.

Also there is a filter option again in detail, which can help you narrow down your search from specifications like battery 
life, RAM, storage and other important features. While searching for a specific product, you get the detailed insights like Nexus 6P.

Similarly, there are relevant criterias for Laptop, Tablet, Speakers and Headphones etc. Now once you have applied your filters, you can get the list of all the products which fall under you buying preference. Once you click on any particular gadget you can see detailed reviews from people on various aspects ranging from performance, design, packaging etc. Now this certainly saves your time and makes the search process quite simpler.

There is an aggregated overall rating ranging from 1 to 5 in the form of stars, along with the number of users who have given it. Also, relative percentage of positive versus negative opinions for that gadget. It also shows the comparative pricing of a gadget on the major E-Commerce platforms. One more point of credibility is that the reviews are from the users who are certified buyers from Amazon, Flipkart or Snapdeal. This ensures that you are reading the review from a person who has actually bought the product and used it personally.

The overall functionality and user interface of AspectWise.in is very comprehensive and simple. It really serves the purpose of increasing credibility from the user reviews and helps in taking better preference based decisions.

Written by Rohit Jha

Tuesday, 12 July 2016

Movie Review: Shan He Gu Ren (Mountains May Depart)

Director Jia Zhangke with his 'Mountains May Depart' (2015) gave us one of the few emotionally well-concocted films of today. Set amidst the advent of capitalist culture in China, Shan He Gu Ren lets us visit 3 time periods and the changes that came along with each of them.

The story revolves around 3 friends born and brought up in the 90s – Tao, Liangzi and Jinsheng. Each of them belonging from a different economic background, that being doting and hardworking Tao, coal miner Liangzi and rich and ruthless Jinsheng. The film opens with a shot of Tao dancing to a Pet Shop Boys track establishing that Tao is a popular culture & people loving individual. Director Zhangke makes use of 3 different aspect ratios for three different time periods:

  1. 4:3 Academy ratio for the portion depicting young Tao, Liangzhi and Jinsheng in 1999.
  2. 16:9 for the second portion depicting 2014 ( modern tv)
  3. And finally, the third portion stepping into the future, i.e. 2025 depicted in 2:35:1.

Aesthetically, Mountains May Depart is almost reaching perfection yet lacks somewhere in pushing the 3rd portion of its plot to its best. Zhangke, however, addresses deeper social and political issues and questions gender roles under the massive umbrella of emotions and social relations.

The first and the second portions are impeccably made with regard to the plot, theme and most importantly the characters. Tao- played by actress Zhao Tao is the performance to look out for throughout the film. She carries the film on her shoulders despite her massive absence from the concluding third of the film. On the cusp of capitalism, when China was just stepping into a new found global culture, director Zhangke forced a form of western modernity on the final portion of the film. Starting from naming Tao and Jinsheng’s son ‘Dollar’ to the portrayal of a love affair between Dollar and his teacher Mia, were all forms of forced impressions of the Western world on the Eastern audiences.

One must also recall the film in the days to come because of stellar performances by Jingdong who played Liangzhi. However, Zijian Dong who was Dollar, let out an amateurish effort to play the character of a boy who led a shattered family life throughout. For one to bear what Dollar did, the character portrayal needed a little more dedication, considering his character’s portion of the story brought an end to the film. Pick any aspect of his character and you’ll see that it leaves a hole – may it be his affection for his mother or hatred for his dad or even love for his teacher.

Moreover, Mountains May Depart is a cinematic project of threes, if you observe closely, three characters, three time periods, three narrative sections and use of three aspect ratios.

Overlooking the faltering third portion of the film and the need for an able scriptwriter for Jia Zhangke, his Mountains May Depart is a must watch for all cine-buffs.

Tao’s dance to Pet Shop Boys in the snow towards the end might even leave you teary eyed if you let it.



Written by Smita Ganguli
Aspiring cyber journalist but too damn opinionated.

Monday, 11 July 2016

Movie Review: Udta Punjab delivers

Truth be told, Udta Punjab was horrible. But in the best way possible.

Definitely not for the faint-hearted, the film opens with Shahid Kapoor's rather confusing, but fantastically portrayed Tommy Singh (similarities between him and a certain rapper whose name rhymes with Shmoney? You're not the only one who noticed) singing praise to cocaine- a fitting prelude to what is about to be 2 hours and 18 minutes of drugs, sex and quite honestly, pain.

Alia Bhatt exceeds expectations and was, at times, cringe worthy- so much so that you just couldn't look away.

Kareena Kapoor's work takes your breath away and Diljit Dosanjh's performance, although not the brightest star shining in Udta Punjab, was commendable.

Fortunately, Shahid Kapoor also takes on the role of being the only comic relief, in an otherwise bleak film. Comic, in the sense, really distressing but funny nonetheless- in a pathetically drug-induced, morbid and humorless kind of way.

In contrast to the stellar cast and direction, the cinematography was, at best, average and the plot doesn't do justice to its actors. The climax heavily disappoints, but the story is worth telling. It sheds invaluable light on Punjab's war on drugs. If the situation is even half as dire as shown, this film had to be made.

Udta Punjab was in the media for weeks before its release for several reasons. Even before its release, the film tested our country's democracy, showed the Indian youth what we're really capable of, and the real meaning of freedom of expression.

And as the hype built, my hopes for this film rose dramatically. I walked into that theater with colossal expectations and can happily report that I walked out feeling like I'd gotten my money's worth.

After the abysmal box office success of Tamasha, a brilliantly conceptualized film, although lacking in plot, Udta Punjab is proof that the Indian audience is still deserving of movies that don't just revolve around beating up thugs. But, if all of this is not for you, they also have thugs.

Folks, this is one worth watching.


Written by Jyotsna Shiv Kumar
Eater of the cupcakes. Art nerd. Lov...er, reeeally liker of psychological horror novels. Your friendly neighborhood tumblr expert.

Why every Movie lover should watch THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING

This is James Marsh’s directorial venture on the biography of the noted physicist Stephen Hawking. The production is the proof of the tremendous research done by the director and the screenplay writer Anthony McCarten. In fact, the deep study and meeting Stephen Hawking have borne fruits for the lead artist Eddie Redmayne. The best actor award Oscars was his for the taking. Felicity Jones who has shown her mettle in her portrayal plays the role of his mate Jane.

This film is laced with romance and the love story of Hawking where the viewer keeps expecting more on the science theories as projected by Hawking. However, the conflict of God versus science is shown in the beginning when hawking starts dating Jane. Felicity shows her strength of expression in the opening scene and they grow in stature by leaps and bounds because love meant everything to her. The gleam in her eyes reveals that she will show God above Hawking’s science.

Hawking is struck by a motor neurone disease that progressively aggravates to erode the cells to erode the muscular motor movements. Only the brain can remain unaffected. The doctor, must pathetically, announces a mere two years time for hawking. He is shattered and yet continues with his study and presentation on his theory that, the Universe must die and with it, its God. He moves further in the study of black holes and his works are noticed by his mentor at the Cambridge. The viewer gets a glimpse of the science lab where noted scientists of the part had experimented.

Hawking decided to avoid Jane but she is determined and the interludes where she tells that the two years of life span can be celebrated and thus they marry. Some intense emotional scenes show the effervescence in the eyes of the two characters. The disease struck hawking shines with his performance. The role is a demanding one and his portrayal matches the zeal of the acting spirit of Eddie Redmayne beyond all measure. The numerous accolades, nominations and the awards speak for all this. It is a cinematic delight, just like the fireworks when they went dating.

They become parents and the title of Doctorate is conferred on him but his health deteriorates. Jane becomes frustrated and on her mother’s suggestion, she joined the church choir to recommence her singing. This provides the script with the entry of the widowed person Jonathan who gains entry in their house as a piano teacher and becomes more than a friend and a help. Jane and Jonathan come close and Stephen senses something.

However, Mr and Mrs Hawking go to Bordeaux for a concert where he falls ill with pneumonia and the doctor is not hopeful at all. Jane sticks to her determination and wants a tracheotomy, which will deprive him of speech forever. He recovers and Elaine played by Maxine Peake as the highly trained nurse enters the scene. Using the spell board communication is easy and a new device, which translates written speech into articulation, helps everyone. “The Brief History of Time” is written by him and is a runaway success bursting all charts. This brings hawking and Elaine close. Jane reveals her feelings for Jonathan and in an emotionally charged scene, the decision to part ways moves the audience. The scene shows the superior performance and the audience is in raptures. It reminds the viewers when Hawking reminds Jane that the doctor had had granted only two years when so many had passed. Thus, hawking part ways and he proceeds to America with Elaine, who loves him.

The final scene is too much when on a delicate question on the existence of God, Hawking sees a pen falling down and he wants to get up but is unable. He then perhaps gets his own answer. He goes on to conclude about the human endeavour and hope, much to the applause of the esteemed audience.

A superb film that received accolades and awards alike. The Box-Office was not lagging behind either. Over 70 million dollars grossed, this film deserves a definite view by every film lover and film critic.


Written by Sukanya Roy
Artist, Critic, Writer, Photographer, Movie buff, Graphic Designer, Literature and Geography enthusiast, Soccer fan, and Imaginative.

 
Back To Top
For Editorial Submissions, Business Inquiries or any other query, do write to us at contact@reviewmantra.com

Copyright © 2017    ReviewMantra |  Terms of use  |  Privacy